Kazakhstan Religious Demographics

Özet

Notes

This map shows the religion practiced by the majority of religious persons in the states of the world. It is pretty good. It does not depict non-religious populations. (For example, although recent surveys[1] estimate that % of French, and % of Swedes self-identify as atheist, agnostic, or non-spriritual, those nations are depicted as Catholic, and Protestant, respectively.) If the ratio of the largest religious group to the next largest religious group is less than , then the color of the state is a blend of the colors of the two largest groups. Therefore:

• Countries such as Lebanon receive a blend of of colors representing the two main religious groups i.e Christians and Muslims
• States consisting of multiple nations, countries, or autonomous regions receive a single color determined by the aggregate of their inhabitants. Thus, Tibet, for example, receives the same color as the People's Republic of China, even though that color does not accurately describe the Vajrayana Buddhist religious affiliation of its inhabitants.
• Persons without a religion (atheists) are not counted in determining the majority religion. Because of this, the Netherlands is colored steel-blue (mixed Protestant and Catholic), even though there are more non-religious people than there are Catholics, who constitute the largest religious group[2].
• Regions within a state whose predominant religion is different from the plurality religion of the nation-state are not separately indicated. Thus, the southern islands of Mindanao, the Sulu archipelago and parts of Palawan which contain most of the Philippines small 5% to 10% Muslim population are painted Catholic pink. Russia is painted Orthodox purple because its officially small Muslim population who cluster around the Caucasus and Tatarstan at 5% to 6%, according to Russian state figures are not numerous enough to justify a mixed green-pink colour.
• In Kazakhstan, Muslims (mostly Sunni) are generally estimated to form around 70% of the population while the large Christian minority (mostly Orthodox) consists of 26% of the population which justifies colouring this state a green in favour of Sunni Islam.
• In Iraq, Shi'ite Muslims are generally estimated to form around 60% to 65% of the population while the large Sunni Muslim minority consists of 35% of the population and Christians only 3% which justifies colouring this state a light green in favour of Shi'ite Islam.
• In contrast, Yemen is colored a mix of light dark green to reflect the fact that no religious group forms 60% of its population; the UNHCR[3] reports that its Shia Zaydi minority forms 45% of the population whereas Sunni Muslims comprise 53% of the population.
• It is interesting to note that predominantly Hindu majority India--at %--according to the census has the second largest population of Muslims in any country of the world which stands at % of this state.
• "Orthodox Christianity" on this map includes both branches that call themselves "Orthodox" (Eastern and Oriental). Thus, Armenia (Armenian Apostolic Church, an Oriental Orthodox denomination) is coloured the same as Georgia (Georgian Orthodox, an autocephalous Eastern Orthodox church).

See also

Lisanslama

Bu belgenin GNU Özgür Belgeleme Lisansı, Sürüm veya Özgür Yazılım Vakfı tarafından yayımlanan sonraki herhangi bir sürüm şartları altında bu belgenin kopyalanması, dağıtılması ve/veya değiştirilmesi için izin verilmiştir; Değişmeyen Bölümler, Ön Kapak Metinleri ve Arka Kapak Metinleri yoktur. Lisansın bir kopyası GNU Özgür Belgeleme Lisansı sayfasında yer almaktadımonash.pw://monash.pw Free Documentation Licensetruetrue

	Bu dosya, Creative CommonsAtıf-Benzer Paylaşım Taşınmamış lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır
	Şu seçeneklerde özgürsünüz: paylaşım – eser paylaşımı, dağıtımı ve iletimi içeriği değiştirip uyarlama – eser adaptasyonu Aşağıdaki koşullar geçerli olacaktır: atıf – Esere yazar veya lisans sahibi tarafından belirtilen (ancak sizi ya da eseri kullanımınızı desteklediklerini ileri sürmeyecek bir) şekilde atıfta bulunmalısınız. benzer paylaşım – Maddeyi yeniden karıştırır, dönüştürür veya inşa ederseniz, katkılarınızı orijinal olarak aynı veya uyumlu lisans altında dağıtmanız gerekir.
	Bu lisanslama etiketi, dosyaya GFDL lisanslama güncelleştirmenin bir parçası olarak eklenmişmonash.pw://monash.pw BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike truetrue

Orijinal yükleme günlüğü

Dosyanın orjinal açıklama sayfası burada bulunmaktadır. Aşağıdaki tüm kullanıcı adları için monash.pwdia bakın.

• LilTeK21 ××??? ( bytes) Reverted to version as of , 11 January

Since their independence from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), over 25 years has passed for the Central Asian countries. Over the years, these countries, both internally and externally, were faced with numerous problems in various degrees. One such problem was regarding the diversification of their economies. Initially, during the Soviet period, each of these countries were part of a large integrated economic structure. After the collapse of this structure, each part of this whole was left on its own and needed to diversify its economy to survive in the globalized economy. This story will be the subject of in another commentary.

These countries, in their 25^th anniversary, are faced with another interesting issue: demographics. This issue is different from common or usual issues such as economy or security. Time will tell if this issue will turn into a problem or to a benifit for these relatively newly independent countries. The decisions these countries will take in the field of demographics will determine not only their own future, but also the future of the region.

When one looks at the demographic trend of Central Asian countries, one is faced with a different picture than the rest of the ex-Soviet countries in the world. If one looks to the Caucasus, the population increase has been relatively small. If one looks to the Baltics, the trend has been in fact reverse; the three Baltic countries have witnessed significant population decrease.[1]

Even though the population growth of the Central Asian countries has been reaching monumental levels as a whole over the last 25 years, this has not been the case for all the countries in the region during the entire time in question. For example, initially, Kazakhstan was following a different demographic trend compared to the rest of the Central Asian countries. This was especially the case for the first decade. This was mainly due to emigration of each ethnic group from Kazakhstan to their ancestral country after the breakup of the USSR. The decline in Kazakhstan’s population only began to reverse over the last the last 15 years due to powerful fertility rates.[2]

This overall trend was not the case for other Central Asian countries. Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan -who also went through population resettlement- were not as effected as Kazakhstan. Thus, they experienced much larger population increases than Kazakhstan. For example, the population boom of Uzbekistan and of Turkmenistan over the last 25 years has been almost 50 percent.[3]

In their post-independence, 25^th year anniversary, the Central Asian countries are faced with another demographic development. These countries are following the overall Western countries’ trend of increased life expectancy. For example, according to World Bank report titled “Golden Aging: Prospects for Healthy, Active and Prosperous Aging in Europe and Central Asia”, the average life expectancy in the five of the Central Asian countries increased from 64 in to 68 in In Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, life expectancy has become over [4]

The demographic shift the Central Asian countries are facing is not limited with the above developments. A more significant occurrence in the demographic shift for Central Asian countries is the change in their multi-ethnic, cosmopolitan nature. The multi-ethnic character of the five Central Asian Central Asian countries, where a significant amount of Russian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian’s were residing,[5] has begun to change especially over the last ten years.

The issue of emigration from Kazakhstan was discussed above. Other Central Asian countries were also similarly affected by these changes. For example, in Kyrgyzstan, the Russian speaking population has decreased from 25 to 7 percent from the Soviet period. In Uzbekistan, this number has decreased to 3 percent. The story of the Russian speaking population in Turkmenistan was more complicated. In the other countries, the process immigration was a more natural process. In Turkmenistan, on the other hand, it involved inter-state politics. After negotiations between the Russian and Turkmen governments, President of Russia Vladimir Putin and President of Turkmenistan Saparmurat Niyazov signed a protocol and terminated the dual citizenship of individuals who resided in Turkmenistan.[6]

The change regarding the ethnic make up of the Central Asian Republics can be seen both as an advantage and a disadvantage.

Individuals from different ethnic groups can contribute in different manners to the economic and cultural development of a country. Individuals from different ethnic backgrounds can increase communication between different countries and create special bilateral ties (such as the one that exists between Turkey and Germany). If the multiethnic makeup of a country is diminishing, so can the potential benefits mentioned here can disappear.

On the downside, there is the potential meddling of foreign powers in the internal politics of these countries. Arguably, foreign powers can use the ethnic groups inside these countries to meddle in the internal politics of these countries and cause political unrest.[7] Although it should be noted that this, in the case of Central Asian countries, has only been a theoretical exercise. So far there has not been any evidence of such a meddling of any global or regional power in the internal politics of these countries.

Lastly, the Central Asian countries must deal with a massive level of urbanization as a demographic phenomenon in the region. Almost all of these countries have implemented what has been called the “concentration model”, in which the population and economic activity have been focused in few large cities. These large cities in turn are coping with the usual problems such entities are facing worldwide.[8]

After a quarter of a century of independence, the Central Asian countries are faced with an interesting phenomenon that presents them with both opportunities and obstacles. On the one hand, they have a booming population. This provides these countries with a young, vibrant population concentrated in medium to large cities with countless economic possibilities. On the other hand, they have an ever-increasing number of senior citizens and a shrinking multi-ethnic population that cause a decrease in the active workforce and may lead to the loss of the cosmopolitan nature of these countries.