View PDF Current accounting period extended from 31 March to 30 June - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Termination of appointment of Benjamin William Goodger as a director on 29 September - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Full accounts made up to 31 March - link opens in a new window - 21 pages (21 pages)
View PDF Appointment of Mrs Samantha Tyrer as a director on 6 March - link opens in a new window - 2 pages (2 pages)
View PDF Termination of appointment of Gervase Paul Adams as a director on 1 March - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Change of details for Dd Group Holdings Ltd as a person with significant control on 20 February - link opens in a new window - 2 pages (2 pages)
View PDF Confirmation statement made on 1 February with updates - link opens in a new window - 4 pages (4 pages)
View PDF Director's details changed for Mr Benjamin William Goodger on 8 June - link opens in a new window - 2 pages (2 pages)
View PDF Director's details changed for Mr Benjamin William Goodger on 1 December - link opens in a new window - 2 pages (2 pages)
View PDF Registration of charge , created on 21 October - link opens in a new window - 56 pages (56 pages)
View PDF Satisfaction of charge in full - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Satisfaction of charge in full - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Satisfaction of charge in full - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Satisfaction of charge in full - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Registration of charge , created on 6 July - link opens in a new window - 48 pages (48 pages)
View PDF Registration of charge , created on 6 July - link opens in a new window - 48 pages (48 pages)
View PDF Registration of charge , created on 6 July - link opens in a new window - 45 pages (45 pages)
View PDF Cessation of Turnstone Equityco 1 Limited as a person with significant control on 8 June - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Termination of appointment of Nilesh Kundanlal Pandya as a director on 6 June - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Termination of appointment of Tom Riall as a director on 6 June - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Satisfaction of charge in full - link opens in a new window - 1 page (1 page)
View PDF Confirmation statement made on 1 February with updates - link opens in a new window - 4 pages (4 pages)
View PDF Full accounts made up to 31 March - link opens in a new window - 21 pages (21 pages)
View PDF Director's details changed for Mr Nilesh Kundanlal Pandya on 12 October - link opens in a new window - 2 pages (2 pages)
View PDF Full accounts made up to 31 March - link opens in a new window - 20 pages (20 pages)
( Originally published on Feb 08, )
In Video: RBI MPC meet: Key changes announced for electronic trading platforms, digital payments and AePS
morelessIf you do an internet search on forex broker scams, the number of results is staggering. While the forex market is slowly becoming more regulated, there are many unscrupulous brokers who should not be in business.
When you're looking to trade forex, it's important to identify brokers who are reliable and viable, and to avoid the ones that are not. In order to sort out the strong brokers from the weak and the reputable ones from those with shady dealings, we must go through a series of stepsbefore depositing a large amount of capital with a broker.
Trading is hard enough in itself, but when a broker implements practices that work against the trader, making a profit can be nearly impossible.
When researching a potential forex broker, traders must learn to separate fact from fiction. For instance, faced with all sorts of forums posts, articles, and disgruntled comments about a broker, we could assume that all traders fail and never make a profit. The traders that fail to make profits then post content online that blames the broker (or some other outside influence) for their own failed strategies.
One common complaint from traders is that a broker was intentionally trying to cause a loss in the form of statements such as, "As soon as I placed the trade, the direction of the market reversed" or "The broker stop hunted my positions," and "I always had slippage on my orders, and never in my favor." These types of experiences are common among traders and it is quite possible that the broker is not at fault.
It is also entirely possible that new forex traders fail to trade with a tested strategy or trading plan. Instead, they make trades based on psychology (e.g., if a trader feels the market has to move in one direction or the other) and there is essentially a 50% chance they will be correct.
When the rookie trader enters a position, they are often entering when their emotions are waning. Experienced traders are aware of these junior tendencies and step in, taking the trade the other way. This befuddles new traders and leaves them feeling that the market—or their brokers—are out to get them and take their individual profits. Most of the time, this is not the case. It is simply a failure by the trader to understand market dynamics.
On occasion, losses are the broker's fault. This can occur when a broker attempts to rack up trading commissions at the client's expense. There have been reports of brokers arbitrarily moving quoted rates to trigger stop orders when other brokers' rates have not moved to that price.
Luckily for traders, this type of situation is an outlier and not likely to occur. One must remember that trading is usually not a zero-sum game, and brokers primarily make commissions with increased trading volumes. Overall, it is in the best interest of brokers to have long-term clients who trade regularly and thus, sustain capital or make a profit.
The slippage issue can often be attributed to behavioral economics. It is common practice for inexperienced traders to panic. They fear missing a move, so they hit their buy key, or they fear losing more and they hit the sell key.
In volatile exchange rate environments, the broker cannot ensure an order will be executed at the desired price. This results in sharp movements and slippage. The same is true for stop or limit orders. Some brokers guarantee stop and limit order fills, while others do not.
Even in more transparent markets, slippage happens, markets move, and we don't always get the price we want.
Real problems can begin to develop when communication between a trader and a broker begins to break down. If a trader does not receive responses from their broker or the broker provides vague answers to a trader's questions, these are common red flags that a broker may not be looking out for the client's best interest.
Issues of this nature should be resolved and explained to the trader, and the broker should also be helpful and display good customer relations. One of the most detrimental issues that may arise between a broker and a trader is the trader's inability to withdraw money from an account.
Protecting yourself from unscrupulous brokers in the first place is ideal. The following steps should help:
It should be pointed out that a broker's size cannot be used to determine the level of risk involved. While larger brokers grow by providing a certain standard of service, the financial crisis taught us that a big or popular firm isn't always safe.
Brokers or planners who are paid commissions for buying and selling securities can sometimes succumb to the temptation to effect transactions simply for the purpose of generating a commission. Those who do this excessively can be found guilty of churning—a term coined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that denotes when a broker places trades for a purpose other than to benefit the client. Those who are found guilty of this can face fines, reprimands, suspension, dismissal, disbarment, or even criminal sanctions in some cases.
The SEC defines churning in the following manner:
"When a broker engages in excessive buying and selling (i.e., trading) of securities in a customer’s account without considering the customer’s investment goals and primarily to generate commissions that benefit the broker, the broker may be engaged in an illegal practice known as churning."
The key to remember here is that the trades that are placed are not increasing your account value. If you have given your broker trading authority over your account, then the possibility of churning can only exist if they are trading your account heavily, and your balance either remains the same or decreases in value over time.
Of course, it is possible that your broker may be genuinely attempting to grow your assets, but you need to find out exactly what they are doing and why. If you are calling the shots and the broker is following your instructions, then that cannot be classified as churning.
One of the clearest signs of churning can be when you see buy and sell trades for securities that don’t fit your investment objectives. For example, if your objective is to generate a current stable income, then you should not be seeing buy and sell trades on your statements for small-cap equity or technology stocks or funds.
Churning with derivatives such as put and call options can be even harder to spot, as these instruments can be used to accomplish a variety of objectives. But buying and selling puts and calls should, in most cases, only be happening if you have a high-risk tolerance. Selling calls and puts can generate current income as long as it is done prudently.
An arbitration panel will consider several factors when they conduct hearings to determine whether a broker has been churning an account. They will examine the trades that were placed in light of the client’s level of education, experience, and sophistication as well as the nature of the client’s relationship with the broker. They will also weigh the number of solicited versus unsolicited trades and the dollar amount of commissions that have been generated as compared to the client’s gains or losses as a result of these trades.
There are times when it may seem like your broker may be churning your account, but this may not necessarily be the case. If you have questions about this and feel uneasy about what your advisor is doing with your money, then don’t hesitate to consult a securities attorney or file a complaint on the SEC's website.
Unfortunately, options are very limited at this stage. However, there are a few things you can do. First, read through all documents to make sure your broker is actually in the wrong. If you have missed something or failed to read the documents you signed, you may have to assume the blame.
Next, discuss the course of action you will take if the broker does not adequately answer your questions or provide a withdrawal. Steps may include posting comments online or reporting the broker to FINRA or the appropriate regulatory body in your country.
While traders may blame brokers for their losses, there are times when brokers really are at fault. A trader needs to be thorough and conduct research on a broker before opening an account and if the research turns up positive for the broker, then a small deposit should be made, followed by a few trades and then a withdrawal. If this goes well, then a larger deposit can be made.
However, if you are already in a problematic situation, you should verify that the broker is conducting illegal activity (such as churning), attempt to have your questions answered, and if all else fails, and/or report the person to the SEC, FINRA, or another regulatory body that could enforce action against them.
аналитика форекс gbp кaртa мирa форекс вспомогательные индикаторы форекс как платят налоги трейдеры валютного рынка форекс лучшие индикаторы для входа индикаторы измерения температуры щитовые дмитрий котенко форекс клипaрт для форекс имхо на форексе дц форекс брокер отзывы безрисковая комбинация форекс индикаторы рынка ферросплавов