dating laetoli footprints
Estimates are largely inferred from known relationships between metric data in living species, such as bone length or joint size and stature or body mass McHenry, , ; Grabowski et al. Year of Discovery: The tracks also have ordinary human arches and, when examined by evolutionist R. The depth distribution pattern indicates that the weight transfer of S1 was similar to that described for G1—3 Robbins, : starting from the heel, the weight was transferred along the lateral part of the foot note the steep slope of the lateral wall of the tracks compared to that on the medial side up to the distal metatarsal region, and from here to the toes. And even if a truly bipedal apelike animal with an arched foot and human-like stride had walked across Laetoli, that would not mean that humans evolved from bipedal apelike animals. The Laetoli footprints are sandwiched between rock dated at 3. Among these, one of the most remarkable pieces of evidence are the renowned trackways from Laetoli Site G northern Tanzania , which are ascribed to Au.
Get StartedDATING LAETOLI FOOTPRINTS / morphy.info
- Secure and Private
- Easy to Use
- Find Matches Quickly
- Verified Profiles